Thursday, July 30, 2009

How do you weigh in on the issue of jobs or the environment? What limits do you set on economic growth?

How do you weigh in on the issue of jobs or the environment? What limits do you set on economic growth? Environmental protection?

How do you weigh in on the issue of jobs or the environment? What limits do you set on economic growth?
The same question was asked of the Greeks, Romans and the European monarchies.





Which do you want, money or arable land?





The environment can be saved if we all went back to an agrarian-based civilization, but the amount of people that would die would be staggering (disease, cancer, heart attacks...all would be 100% fatal almost immediately since there would be no hospitals).





The job factor is important to continue to grow and survive as a civilization. Without jobs, there would be no growth in any area of business.





The fine line is there. We just need to straddle it by having environmental projects, green technology and consumer buy-in on the ideas. If we give people a choice, they'd go greener that they are now.
Reply:I think jobs FOR the environment is the wave of the future... but will probably be delayed by Republican deadheads.
Reply:I vote for the enviroment and not jobs, We need a recession in this country, and an end to growth fueled by borrowing. Professional sports should be banned in favor of enviromentl works. Pro river clening instead of wrestling. Parks instead of arenas. Organic farming instead of


walmart greeter.


No comments:

Post a Comment